翻訳と辞書
Words near each other
・ The Best American Short Stories 2001
・ The Best American Short Stories 2002
・ The Best American Short Stories 2003
・ The Best American Short Stories 2004
・ The Best American Short Stories 2005
・ The Best American Short Stories 2006
・ The Best American Short Stories 2007
・ The Best American Short Stories 2008
・ The Best American Short Stories 2009
・ The Best American Short Stories 2010
・ The Best American Short Stories 2011
・ The Best American Short Stories 2012
・ The Best American Short Stories 2013
・ The Best American Sports Writing
・ The Best American Travel Writing
The Best and the Brightest
・ The Best and the Brightest (film)
・ The Best and the Rest
・ The Best and Worst of Tred Barta
・ The Best Australian Poems 2012
・ The Best Australian Poetry 2007
・ The Best Awful There Is
・ The Best Bad Man
・ The Best Bad Thing
・ The Best Band in the Land
・ The Best Band You Never Heard in Your Life
・ The Best Bang!!
・ The Best Best of Fela Kuti
・ The Best Bet
・ The Best Bits of Mr. Bean


Dictionary Lists
翻訳と辞書 辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ]
スポンサード リンク

The Best and the Brightest : ウィキペディア英語版
The Best and the Brightest

''The Best and the Brightest'' (1972) is an account by journalist David Halberstam of the origins of the Vietnam War published by Random House. The focus of the book is on the erroneous foreign policy crafted by the academics and intellectuals who were in John F. Kennedy's administration, and the disastrous consequences of those policies in Vietnam. The title referred to Kennedy's "whiz kids"—leaders of industry and academia brought into the Kennedy administration—whom Halberstam characterized as arrogantly insisting on "brilliant policies that defied common sense" in Vietnam, often against the advice of career U.S. Department of State employees.
==Summary==
Halberstam's book offers a great deal of detail on how the decisions were made in the Kennedy and Johnson administrations that led to the war, focusing on a period from 1960 to 1965 but also covering earlier and later years up to the publication year of the book.
Many influential factors are examined in the book:
*The Democratic party was still haunted by claims that it had 'lost China' to Communists, and it did not want to be said to have lost Vietnam also
*The McCarthy era had rid the government of experts in Vietnam and surrounding Far-East countries
*Early studies called for close to a million U.S. troops to completely defeat the Viet Cong, but it would be impossible to convince Congress or the U.S. public to deploy that many soldiers
*Declarations of war and excessive shows of force, including bombing too close to China or too many U.S. troops, might have triggered the entry of Chinese ground forces into the war, as well as greater Soviet involvement, which might repair the growing Sino-Soviet rift.
*The American military and generals were not prepared for protracted guerilla warfare.
*Some war games showed that a gradual escalation by the United States could be evenly matched by North Vietnam: Every year, 200,000 North Vietnamese came of draft age and could be sent down the Ho Chi Minh Trail to replace any losses against the U.S.: the U.S. would be "fighting the birthrate."
*Any show of force by the U.S. in the form of bombing or ground forces would signal the U.S. interest in defending South Vietnam and therefore cause the U.S. greater shame if they were to withdraw
*President Johnson's belief that too much attention given to the war effort would jeopardize his Great Society domestic programs
*The effects of strategic bombing: Most people wrongly believed that North Vietnam prized its industrial base so much it would not risk its destruction by U.S. air power and would negotiate peace after experiencing some limited bombing. Others saw that, even in World War II, strategic bombing united the victim population against the aggressor and did little to hinder industrial output.
*The Domino Theory rationales are mentioned as simplistic.
*After placing a few thousand Americans in harm's way, it became politically easier to send hundreds of thousands over with the promise that, with enough numbers, they could protect themselves and that to abandon Vietnam now would mean the earlier investment in money and blood would be thrown away.
The book shows that the gradual escalation initially allowed the Johnson Administration to avoid negative publicity and criticism from Congress and avoid a direct war against the Chinese, but it also lessened the likelihood of either victory or withdrawal.

抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア(Wikipedia)
ウィキペディアで「The Best and the Brightest」の詳細全文を読む



スポンサード リンク
翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース

Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.